¶1The order denying appellant’s third motion for postconviction relief is affirmed, because the motion constitutes an abusive successive motion. See Christopher v. State, 489 So.2d 22 (Fla.1986).
¶2AFFIRMED.
719 So. 2d 354
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 12, 1998
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1998-10-12
Relies on 489 So. 2d 22 - Christopher v. State
Decided 1998-10-12
¶1The order denying appellant’s third motion for postconviction relief is affirmed, because the motion constitutes an abusive successive motion. See Christopher v. State, 489 So.2d 22 (Fla.1986).
¶2AFFIRMED.