¶1Given the totality of the circumstances, we conclude that the school official had reasonable suspicion to conduct a search of the appellant juvenile. See New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325, 341-43, 105 S.Ct. 733, 83 L.Ed.2d 720 (1985); A.S. v. State, 693 So.2d 1095, 1095 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); State v. D.T.W., 425 So.2d 1383, 1386-87 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). We therefore, find no error in the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s motion to suppress.
¶2Affirmed.