Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

719 So. 2d 394

Hunt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 4, 1998

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1998-11-04

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 2005

1 state decisions

Relies on Jackson v. State · Fairell v. State · Rozier v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-11-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

¶2The appellant argues, the state concedes, and we hold that the inability of the court reporter to prepare transcripts of the trial and the stipulated impossibility of reconstructing the record require reversal of the judgment of conviction and remand for a new trial. Fairell v. State, 662 So.2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Felton v. State, 523 So.2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Rozier v. State, 669 So.2d 353 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Jackson v. State, 308 So.2d 600 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). It is so ordered.

/719/so2d/394 · .json · Public domain