Rains v. Gardner’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mladinich v. Kohn · Kersh v. Derozier · 361 So. 2d 324 - Arrow Food Distributors, Inc. v. Love · 610 So. 2d 374 - Hurst v. Southwest Miss. Legal Services Corp. · Sandifer v. Sandifer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Certainly, a person may waive process and enter an appearance, and that appearance may be made by an attorney authorized by the party to do so. However, a disputed assertion that such an event has occurred raises an issue of fact. The party claiming such an appearance has the burden of proof on the question.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“There are some differences in the facts which the Court will hear but we ask the Court to dismiss [the complaint] as to Ms. Clark also under the rule that I read. But it's the Court's duty to do that....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“I'm not representing to the Court that I represent anybody but Ms. Gardner, but Ms. Clark ought to also be dismissed. It's the Court's duty under this rule to do that.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.