Walker v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently October 2016
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 545 So. 2d 1341 - Weisfeld v. Weisfeld · Polizzi v. Polizzi · 578 So. 2d 497 - Ensley v. Ensley · McKenzie v. McKenzie · 641 So. 2d 499 - Tunnage v. Bostic
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a key factor in such cases is whether or not there is any conflict or inconsistency between the judge's statements or findings at the time of trial and the ultimate judgment entered later, or if there is a factual finding in the final judgment unsupported by the trial evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he purpose of this rule is to allow the trial court to recall the testimony and demeanor of witnesses and the dynamics of the trial in rendering the final judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“every judge has a duty to rule upon and announce an order or judgment on every matter submitted to that judge within a reasonable time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.