Johnson v. Schmidt’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2024
18 state decisions — followed in 11 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Byers v. Burleson · Johnson v. Raban · In Interest of J________ Y________ · Lansdown v. State · State v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The present action is premature, until such time as appellant is successful in seeur-ing post-conviction relief upon a finding that he was denied effective assistance of counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Morrison v. Goff“[s]uch cases also require the plaintiff to 'allege and establish that the actions or omissions by [the trial attorney] prevented [the plaintiff's] acquittal.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Juan v. Growe
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.