Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 ALA 361 - Turner v. Wilkinson

Turner v. Wilkinson’s Empirical Analysis

1882

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
5
states following
August 1956
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently August 1956 · most notably Pollak v. Millsap (1928), Corley v. Vizard (1919)

32 state decisions

9018821890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Locke's v. Palmer · Mobile Building & Loan Ass'n v. Robertson · Morrow v. Turney's Adm'r · Robinson v. Farrelly · Parish v. Gates

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Although it is difficult to establish fixed rules, by which to determine whether a particular transaction is a mortgage, or a conditional sale, there are some facts which are regarded as of controlling importance in determining the question. Did the relation of debtor and creditor exist, before and at the time of the transaction? Or, if not, did the transaction commence in a negotiation for a loan of money? Was there great disparity between the value of the property, and the consideration passing for it? Is there a debt continuing, for the payment of which the vendor is liable? If any one of these facts is found to exist, in a doubtful case, it will go far to show a mortgage was intended. If all of them are found concurring, the transaction will be regarded as a mortgage, rather than a conditional sale, unless the purchaser, by clear and convincing evidence, removes the presumptions, arising from them. Eiland v. Radford, 7 Ala. 724 , 42 Am. Dec. 610 ; Robinson v. Farrelly, 16 Ala. 472 ; Locke’s Ex’r v. Palmer, 26 Ala. 312 ; Crews v. Threadgill, 35 Ala. 334 ; Mobile Bldg. & Loan Ass’n v. Robertson, 65 Ala. 382 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.