In Re Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
April 2004
most recently cited
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 2004
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 364 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 11 U.S.C. § 544 · 11 U.S.C. § 552
Relies on In Re Kruse · In Re Sheehan · First National Bank of Colorado Springs v. Hamilton (In Re Hamilton) · Matter of Gross-Feibel Co., Inc. · Matter of Alafia Land Development Corp.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.