Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 BR 613 - In Re Citrowske

In Re Citrowske’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
July 2012
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently July 2012 · most notably Hardzog v. Federal Land Bank of Wichita (1990), Greseth v. Federal Land Bank (In Re Greseth) (1987)

5 federal appellate · 3 district ·

3001987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 586 (§ 224 of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 (Title 11))

Relies on Prudential Insurance v. Monnier · United States v. Neal Pharmacal Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “court is without authority to determine or in any way adjust the compensation ... of the standing trustee”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Absent any evidence of collusive or discriminatory policies, the interest rate which the creditor involved would charge to the debtor in the present regular loan market is presumptively the correct interest rate, keeping in mind, however, that the ultimate decision about the quality of the security and the risk of subsequent default is for the court and not the creditor.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “This is so even if the plan provides that the payment will actually be made by the debtors or from some other source. Since there is no financial advantage to the debtors distributing direct payments under the plan, there is little reason not to require all income dedicated for plan payments to be paid to the trustee to be distributed pursuant to the plan.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.