Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 CAL 133 - Cannon v. Handley

Cannon v. Handley’s Empirical Analysis

1887

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
11
states following
June 1961
most recently cited

2 district · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently June 1961 · most notably Shreeves v. Pearson (1924), Osborn v. Osborn (1954)

2 district · 36 state decisions — followed in 11 states

90188718901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Worrall v. . Munn · Rutenberg v. Main · Washburn v. Dewey · Rivenburgh v. Rivenburgh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But it is said there was nothing in writing authorizing Cox to hold or deliver the deed. There is nothing in the statute which requires this to be in writing The statute only requires a note or memorandum in writing as evidence of the contract. Nothing in it has reference to any arrangement for the delivery of the deed in escrow, or its subsequent delivery by the parties so holding it to the grantee.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.