Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 Cal. 232 - Dore v. Dougherty

Dore v. Dougherty’s Empirical Analysis

1887

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
November 1939
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently November 1939

9 state decisions

80188718901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McBride v. Fallon · Davis v. Mitchell · Keybers v. McComber · Dougherty v. Dore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Of course it is not denied that a judgment is property, or that it can be the subject of assignment. The ruling is based entirely upon the statute. And it seems to us that it necessarily follows that the debt was by the proceeding duly levied upon. Service of the writ and notice constituted what is usually called the process of garnishment ... This put Miller in the attitude of a creditor, and gave him the right to attack the assignment for fraud. ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.