Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 Cal. App. 2d 629 - Rolando v. Everett

72 Cal. App. 2d 629 - Rolando v. Everett’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
November 1966
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Stephens v. . Perrine · Noyes v. Bank of Italy · Ruggles v. Cannedy · Cardenas v. Miller · Old Settlers Investment Co. v. White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The certificate of acknowledgment, unless it is otherwise in this article provided, must be substantially in the following form: “State of — “County of | ss. “On this - the year — day of ■ -, m —, before me (here insert name and quality of the officer), personally appeared -, known to me (or proved to me on the oath of-) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledge that he (she or they) executed the same. * * *»”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.