Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 CALAPP2D 804 - Krobitzsch v. Middleton

Krobitzsch v. Middleton’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
October 1989
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 1989

14 state decisions

7019461950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co. · Smith v. Bangham · Parke v. Franciscus · Strong v. . Sheffield · Main Street & Agricultural Park Railroad v. Los Angeles Traction Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Unless but one inference can be drawn from the evidence, waiver and estoppel are questions for the jury or the trial court.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.