Bergner v. Horn

Decided February 4, 1896.)

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1896-02-04

<p>Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Maryland.</p> <p>This was a bill by William C. Horn, president of Koch, Sons & Go., an unincorporated joint stock company, against Frederick Bergner and others, for infringement of a patent. There was a decree for an injunction and an accounting (68 Fed. 428), from which defendants appealed.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1961

2 counsel of record

Relies on Horn v. Bergner

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1896-02-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Maryland.

¶2This was a bill by William C. Horn, president of Koch, Sons & Go., an unincorporated joint stock company, against Frederick Bergner and others, for infringement of a patent. There was a decree for an injunction and an accounting (68 Fed. 428), from which defendants appealed.

¶3H. T. Fenton and Edgar H. Gans, for appellants.

¶4Alan D. Kenyon and William Houston Kenyon, for appellee.

¶5Before GOFF and SIMONTON, Circuit Judges, and BRAWLEY, District Judge.

¶6PER CURIAM.

¶7We see no error in the conclusion Reached by the circuit court. The decree of that court is affirmed, with costs.