¶1Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Washington.
¶2William H. Brinkerj U. S. Atty.
¶3F. Campbell, for appellee.
¶4Reversed, on authority of Eells v. Ross, 12 C. C. A. 205, 64 Fed. 417.
72 F. 687
Docket No. 142.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Decided October 10, 1894.)
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1894-10-10
<p>Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Washington.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1909
2 counsel of record
Relies on Eells v. Ross
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1894-10-10
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Washington.
¶2William H. Brinkerj U. S. Atty.
¶3F. Campbell, for appellee.
¶4Reversed, on authority of Eells v. Ross, 12 C. C. A. 205, 64 Fed. 417.