Salisbury v. Bennett’s Empirical Analysis
72 F. 743 · 1896
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
June 1926
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Indianapolis and St Louis Railroad Company v. Horst · Hart v. . Kip · People Steinson v. . Board of Educ. of the City of N.Y. · Arnold v. Chesebrough
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Nevertheless, when application is made to the favor of the court for leave to interpose any defense, and the application is one resting in discretion, all the circumstances of the case will he considered, and care taken not to sanction any such abuse of procedure as would shock the conscience.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.