¶1In forma pauperis.
¶2Howard Armstrong, of Atlanta, Ga., in pro. per.
¶3H. T. Nichols, Sp. Atty., of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.
¶4Before BRYAN, FOSTER, and SIBLEY, Circuit Judges.
¶6The judgment is affirmed.
72 F.2d 1008
Docket No. 7216.
Armstrong v. Aderhold
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
Decided Oct. 8, 1934.
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1934-10-08
Cited by 3 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1955
2 federal appellate ·
3 counsel of record
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1934-10-08
View the full empirical analysis of this case →