Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

72 F.2d 1012

Docket Nos. 7407, 7620-7622.

Dougherty v. Dougherty

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 8, 1934.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1934-10-08

5 counsel of record

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1934-10-08

¶1Cosgrove & O’Neil and Homer N. Boardman, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

¶2James Farraher, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee Dougherty and others.

¶3Doekweiler & Dockweiler, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee Getty.

¶4Everts, Ewing, Wild & Everts and A. W. Carlson, all of Fresno, Cal., for appellee Standard Oil Co.

¶5Humphrey, Searls, Doyle & McMillan and Robert M. Searls, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee Associated Oil.

¶6Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and GARRECHT, Circuit Judges.

¶7*1013PER CURIAM.

¶8Upon stipulations of counsel for respective parties, ordered appeal in each of above canses dismissed, without costs to either party, decrees of dismissal filed and entered, and mandates forthwith.

/72/f2d/1012 · .json · Public domain