Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 F.2d 528 - Kershaw v. Julien

Kershaw v. Julien’s Empirical Analysis

72 F.2d 528 · 1934

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 1946
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mammoth Oil Co. v. United States · Aldrich v. Chemical National Bank · Twist v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co. · Blakey v. Brinson · Tyler v. Savage

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But a statement by an experienced banker to a confiding customer that a note is amply secured, when he knows it is not, is more than an expression of opinion; it is a deliberate misrepresentation of a fact-.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.