Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 F.3d 1096 - Williams v. Rene

Williams v. Rene’s Empirical Analysis

72 F.3d 1096 · 1995

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
June 2016
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably Better Building Maintenance of the Virgin Islands, Inc. v. Lee (2014), Wilburn v. Maritrans GP Inc. (1998)

5 federal appellate · 7 district ·

140199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co. · Builders Supply Co. v. McCabe · Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Videfreeze Corp. · International Business Machines Corp. v. Edelstein · DeMarines v. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a)(1) If during a trial by jury a party has been fully heard on an issue and there is no legally sufficient evidentiary basis for a reasonable jury to find for that party on that issue, the court may determine the issue against that party and may grant a motion for judgment as a matter of law against that party. . . (2) Motions for judgment as a matter of law may be made at any time before submission of the case to the jury. . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““[c]onduct of a servant is within the scope of employment if, but only if: (a) it is of the kind he is employed to perform; (b) it occurs substantially within the authorized time and space limits; (c) it is actuated, at least in part, by a purpose to serve the master, and (d) if force is intentionally used by the servant against another, the use of force is not unexpectable by the master.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the issue of damages . . . is so intertwined with liability that one cannot be submitted to the jury independently of the other without confusion and uncertainty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.