Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

72 F.3d 126

Docket No. 95-7335.

Edwards v. Ponte

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Nov. 21, 1995. Decided Dec. 15, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-12-15

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 2106 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Dedes v. Page

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-12-15

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Charles Edwards, Appellant Pro Se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-95-469-5-CT-BR)

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and affirm the 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d) (1988) dismissal on the reasoning of the district court. Edwards v. Ponte, No. CA-95-469-5-CT-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 9, 1995). However, we modify the order to reflect a dismissal without prejudice. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2106 (1988). Additionally, we deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

/72/f3d/126 · .json · Public domain