Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

72 F.3d 128

Docket No. 95-7448.

Stevens v. Hampton

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Nov. 16, 1995. Decided Dec. 12, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-12-12

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United States America v. Hayes

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-12-12

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-93-2597-3-17BD).

David Stevens, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson II, Elizabeth Newell Keenan, ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON, SIMS, MORRISON & SOJOURNER, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Stevens v. Hampton, No. CA-93-2597-3-17BD (D.S.C. Aug. 10, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/72/f3d/128 · .json · Public domain