Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

72 F.3d 134

Docket No. 95-2117SI.

United States v. Sanchez

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: December 7, 1995. Filed: December 21, 1995.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-12-07

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Elmer Webb, Sr. v. Pulitzer Publishing Company, Etc.

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-12-07

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.

Before FAGG, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Pedro Luis Sanchez appeals the district court's order dismissing Sanchez's second 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion. Essentially, the district court concluded Sanchez's second motion was successive and abusive, and Sanchez failed to show cause and prejudice or a fundamental miscarriage of justice to excuse his successive and abusive claims. On review, we find no error of law in the district court's analysis. We thus affirm the decision of the district court without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

/72/f3d/134 · .json · Public domain