Toops’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
2 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently December 2023
2 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Henslee v. Union Planters National Bank & Trust Co. · Fontenot v. Upjohn Co. · Van Dyke v. Boswell, O'Toole, Davis & Pickering
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(F)or a vehicle to constitute a hired automobile, there must be a separate contract by which the vehicle is hired or leased to the named insured for his exclusive use or control”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(I)n order for a vehicle to constitute a hired automobile it must be under the named insured's exclusive use or control”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“]; Russom v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 421 F.2d 985 , 993 [6th Cir.1970] [”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.