Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 F.3d 552 - Williams v. Banning

Williams v. Banning’s Empirical Analysis

72 F.3d 552 · 1995

Citation profile

165
cited by 165 later decisions
4
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

50 federal appellate · 32 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 165 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably Barbara Sheridan v. Ei Dupont De Nemours and Company Jacques Amblard (1996), Venters v. City of Delphi (1997)

50 federal appellate · 32 district · 5 state decisions

9801995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 630 (§ 11 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (§ 101 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 1981A · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson · Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co. · Tomka v. Seiler Corp. · Hebert v. Brown · Busby v. City of Orlando

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 165 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is a statutory expression of traditional respondeat superior liability. Limits on damages which correspond to the size of the employer reinforce our reading of the statutory scheme. Id. Our ruling is seconded by a similar interpretation of”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'[c]ourts routinely apply arguments regarding individual liability to all three statutes [the ADA, the ADEA and Title VII] interchangeably.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a person engaged in an industry affecting commerce ... and any agent of such a person.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.