Urso v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
72 F.3d 59 · 1995
Citation profile
46 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Palmquist v. Selvik (1997), Rice v. Barnhart (2004)
46 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7121 · 26 U.S.C. § 7430
Relies on Botany Worsted Mills v. United States · United States v. Beebe · Stone v. Bank of Commerce · United States v. Gomez · Bammerlin v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[We] decline[ ] to entertain [an] appeal[ ] when the appellant does not file a required appendix.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Apparent authority is not enough to bind the federal government to a contract; unless the agent had actual authority, any agreement is ineffectual.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“specify the judgment sought and the law and the facts on which the moving party is entitled to the judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.