Troupe v. Groose’s Empirical Analysis
72 F.3d 75 · 1995
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Purkett v. Elem · Marshall v. Lonberger · Anderson v. Goeke · United States v. Carr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a reasonable probability that the error[s] affected the trial's outcome.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“fatally infected the trial and rendered it fundamentally unfair.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ivy v. Bowersox · Oliver v. Wood
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.