Jones v. Chater’s Empirical Analysis
72 F.3d 81 · 1995
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Sheila J. Young v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security (2000), Roe v. Chater (1996)
7 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Whitehouse v. Sullivan · Bates v. Chater · Montgomery v. Chater · Smith v. Shalala
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“approximate maximum requirements for each position, rather than [the] range.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“reflect[ ] jobs as they have been found to occur, but ... may not coincide in every respect with the content of jobs as performed in particular establishments or at certain localities.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Even though the expert did not specifically recite those factors in his answers, the ALJ could properly assume that the expert framed his answers based on the factors the ALJ told him to take into account”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Page v. Astrue
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.