In Re Oliver L. North (Regan Fee Application)’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
July 2005
most recently cited
Relationships
Relies on Olson v. 86-1 · In Re Oliver L. North (Dutton Fee Application) · In Re Oliver L. North (Bush Fee Application) · In Re Raymond J Donovan · In Re Oliver L. North (Shultz Fee Application)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“requirement, the court should determine whether a Department of Justice that was not tainted by a conflict of interest could have carried out the same investigation without questioning Reagan and scrutinizing his conduct. Because any prosecutor charged with investigating the Iran/Contra matter would have interviewed Reagan and investigated the extent of his knowledge of these matters, IC Walsh maintains that Reagan fails the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“requirement of the Act, we have previously noted that a politically appointed Attorney General would not have subjected attempts to circumvent the Boland Amendments 2 to criminal prosecution and thus”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Dutton, 11 F.3d at 1080; see also In re North (Bush Fee Application), 59 F.3d 184 , 188 (D.C.Cir. Spec. Div.1995) (per curiam). Accordingly, we conclude that Reagan has met the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.