Flamm v. Eberstadt’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2006
1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on United States v. Peltier · Dioguardi v. United States · Mitchell A. KRAMER and David C. Harrison v. SCIENTIFIC CONTROL CORP. Et Al. Appeal of ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO. · In re Hotel Telephone Charges · Phillips v. Klassen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.