Brady v. LAC, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 2000
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Brady v. United States · United States v. Bornstein · Stevens v. Marks · Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin · Green v. Wolf Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that the requirements of Rule 23(a) have been satisfied;”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.