Walling v. Lippold’s Empirical Analysis
1947
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 2011
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 29 U.S.C. § 207 · 29 U.S.C. § 211 · 29 U.S.C. § 215
Relies on Brooklyn Sav Bank v. O'Neil Dize · Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. Missel · Rutherford Food Corp. v. McComb · Opp Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Administrator of the Wage & Hour Division of the Department of Labor · Bartels v. Birmingham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[p]rivate agreements between an employer and employee which have the effect of limiting or abrogating the scope or purpose of the [Fair Labor Standards] Act will not be upheld.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Every employer shall pay to each of his employees ... wages at the following rates.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.