Barapind v. Reno’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3184 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 1927 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · United States v. Testan · Lindh v. Murphy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to control the disposition of the cases on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants. How this can best be done calls for the exercise of judgment, which must weigh competing interests and maintain an even balance. [ ] The suppliant for a stay must make out a clear case of hardship or inequity in being required to go forward.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“with his right to a final adjudication of his asylum application. 2 9 On the INS's motion to dismiss, the district court held it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Barapind's claims after the passage of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“expel, return (`refouler') or extradite a person to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.