72 F. Supp. 2d 1202 - Ramey v. Rizzuto’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (§ 1900 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396C (§ 1904 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396N (§ 1915 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396P (§ 1917 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Wright v. City of Roanoke Redevelopment & Housing Authority · Schweiker v. Gray Panthers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A state agency's determination of procedural and substantive compliance with federal law is not entitled to the deference afforded a federal agency.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kadingo v. Johnson“other than to qualify for medical assistance”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kadingo v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.