72 F. Supp. 2d 1229 - Rodriguez v. Herrera’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3621 · 18 U.S.C. § 3625 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Becerra-Jimenez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Fristoe v. Rg Thompson · Martinez v. Flowers · Hicks v. Brooks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he revised provision runs afoul of Fristoe by declaring a category of statutorily eligible inmates 'ineligible' solely on the basis of sentencing factors implicated neither by the nature of the underlying offense nor by the definition of violent crimes set forth at 18 U.S.C. 924(c)(3).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ward v. Booker“the fact Petitioners are eligible for consideration for early release under 3621(e)(2)(B) does not mean they are entitled to early release”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ward v. Booker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.