Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 FSUPP2D 834 - Simmons-Harris v. Zelman

Simmons-Harris v. Zelman’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
April 2006
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1407

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Lemon v. Kurtzman · Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We would be loath to adopt a rule grounding the constitutionality of a facially neutral law on annual reports reciting the extent to which various classes of private citizens claimed benefits under the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[s]uch an approach would scarcely provide the certainty that this field stands in need of, nor can we perceive principled standards by which such statistical evidence might be evaluated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “the one cardinal objective of education to which all others point is to develop devotion to God as our Creator, Redeemer, and Sanctifier,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.