72 F. Supp. 3d 910 - Doe v. Clavijo’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on 54 Cal. 3d 202 - Mary M. v. City of Los Angeles · Northern Indiana Gun & Outdoor Shows, Inc. v. City of South Bend · 224 Ill. 2d 154 - Bagent v. Blessing Care Corp. · Pisciotta v. Old National Bancorp · 233 Ill. 2d 276 - Adames v. Sheahan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] reasonable jury could conclude from the allegations in the complaint that the Defendant Officers were acting within the scope of their employment when they sexually assaulted Plaintiff. The Defendant Officers were on duty, sitting in their police car, wearing their uniforms, and carrying their weapons. Further, Plaintiff alleges that she would not have walked over to the Defendant Officers when they gestured to her, nor would she have gotten into their car, if they were not police officers”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.