Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 GA 280 - Smith v. Eubanks & Hill

Smith v. Eubanks & Hill’s Empirical Analysis

1884

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
5
states following
May 1964
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently May 1964 · most notably Porter v. Johnson (1895), Kenny v. Collier (1887)

2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

70188418901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The successors of plaintiff may have been more popular, and thus have made better customers; may have managed better and made more money. They may have been men of better habits, more prudent and successful business men.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.