Gorospe v. Matsui’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boulton v. Boulton · Honolulu Star Bulletin, Ltd. v. Burns · Zator Ex Rel. Zator v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance · In Re the Tax Appeal of Pacific Marine & Supply Co. · Crawford for Crawford v. Crawford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If any person entitled to bring any action specified in this part (excepting actions against the sheriff, chief of police, or other officers) is, at the time the cause of action accrued ... [i]nsane[,] ... such person shall be at liberty to bring such actions within the respective times limited in this part, after the disability is removed or at any time while the disability exists.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Buck v. Miles
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.