Youngberg v. Walsh’s Empirical Analysis
1905
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1962
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cameron, Hull & Co. v. Marvin · Dempsey v. Pforzheimer · McVay v. English · Utley v. Fee · American Lead Pencil Co. v. Champion
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““That any and all instruments in writing or promissory notes now in existence or hereafter executed evidencing the conditional sale of personal property, and that retains the title to the same in the vendor until the purchase price is paid in full, shall be void as against innocent purchaser, or the creditors of the vendee, unless the original instrument, or a true copy thereof, shall have been deposited in the office of the register of deeds of the county wherein the property shall be kept, and shall be entered upon the records the same as a chattel mortgage, and when so deposited shall remain in full force and effect until the amount of the same is fully paid, without the renewal of the same by the vendor.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““Every mortgage . . . shall be absolutely void as against the creditors of the mortgagor, . . . unless the mortgage . . .” is recorded.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Campbell v. Killion
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.