Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 KAN 330 - Stowell v. Kerr

Stowell v. Kerr’s Empirical Analysis

1905

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
3
states following
July 2008
most recently cited

4 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 2008

4 district · 12 state decisions

11019051910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Edwards v. Fry · Scofield v. Hopkins · Reske v. Reske · Tarrant v. Swain · Moore v. Reaves

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As the land was purchased with the definite intention of making it a homestead, it had the homestead character from the beginning. The law does not prohibit a judgment debtor from procuring a homestead which will be exempt from forced sale for debts, nor is there anything in its purpose warranting the view that in the purchase of a homestead a judgment hen will outrun a homestead interest. On the other hand, the homestead law is given a practical and liberal interpretation in keeping with its policy and purpose. While occupancy is an essential feature of a homestead right, it is well known that complete occupancy at the moment of purchase is frequently impracticable.” (Quoting from earlier cases.) (p. 331.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““On the purchase of a homestead there should be such occupancy as the situation warrants. To preserve the homestead character full occupancy as a residence should be taken within a reasonable time, and, if that is done, the occupancy will relate back to the time when the property was purchased with the bona fide intent to make it a homestead.” (Page 382.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““A purchase of a homestead, with a view to occupancy, followed by occupancy within a reasonable time, may secure ab initio a homestead inviolability.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.