¶1The only question argued in this case by the plaintiff in error is that there was an absolute want of any testimony to support the judgment in the court below. With this contention we cannot agree. There is not only substantial but sufficient evidence found in the record to support the conclusions and judgment of the court. For this reason the judgment is affirmed.
72 Kan. 702
Muse v. Meeker
Decided December 9, 1905
Supreme Court of Kansas · decided 1905-12-09
<p>Error from Pawnee district court; Charles E. Lob-dell, judge.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1907
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1905-12-09
View the full empirical analysis of this case →