Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

72 Mass. 435

Jones v. Root

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 15, 1856

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1856-09-15

<p>Section 13 of St. 1855, c. 215, which authorizes officers, without a warrant, to arrest any person found in the act of illegally selling or transporting intoxicating liquors, and seize the liquors, vessels and implements of sale in the possession of such person, and detain them in some place of safe keeping until warrants can be procured for tbs trial of the person and the seizure of the liquors, is constitutional.</p> <p>An officer, who arrests, under St. 1855, c. 215, § 13, a person in the act of illegally transporting intoxicating liquors in a wagon, may detain the wagon and horses for such time as is reasonably necessary to remove the liquors from the wagon; and is not bound to seek out the owner of the horses and wagon and restore them to him, even if not privy to such transportation; and may remove them from the travelled part of the highway to prevent an obstruction thereof; and take them into his own barn for the purpose of saving the horses from suffering, until called for by the owner.</p> <p>On the trial of an action brought against an officer by the owner of a horse and wagon for seizing them while employed in the illegal transportation of intoxicating liquors, the plaintiff cannot except to a comparison by the judge, by way of illustration, of the rights of the defendant in this case to that of an officer seizing a horse and wagon employed in a burglary.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1856-09-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2001

3 state decisions

201856186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Metcalf, J.

¶1We are of opinion that § 13 of St. 1855, c. 215, which authorizes the seizure of liquors, is not unconstitutional; that the law was in all respects correctly stated to the jury; that the verdict has established the facts which, by the law, constituted" a defence to the action; and that the illustration used by the judge in his remarks to the jury, which is excepted tr by the plaintiff, is not a legal ground of exception.

¶2 Exceptions overruled.

/72/mass/435 · .json · Public domain