72 Md. App. 508 - Aud v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2007
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Hoffa v. United States · 81 Wis. 2d 555 - State v. Waste Management of Wisconsin, Inc. · 94 Wash. 2d 531 - State v. Williams · Carr v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Unquestionably, under Maryland law, denying defense counsel a copy of a witness’s written statement prior to the commencement of cross-examination amounts to a denial to the defendant of due process of law. The error is not cured by allowing the court to review the written statement in order to determine its usefulness, inasmuch as that judgment is for defense counsel to make, not the court. [Citations omitted.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“At the request of either the Governor, Attorney General, General Assembly or a State’s Attorney, the State Prosecutor may investigate criminal activity conducted or committed partly in this State and partly in another jurisdiction, or which is conducted or committed in more than one political subdivision of the State.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.