Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 MO 144 - Dailey v. Jessup

Dailey v. Jessup’s Empirical Analysis

1880

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 1947
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 1947

6 state decisions

201880189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Griffith v. Townley · Faust's Administratrix v. Birner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is unnecessary to cite authorities in support of the proposition that mere ignorance of the law on the part of a party to a contract will not authorize a court of equity to set aside the contract. There must be something more. The circumstances attending the making of the contract must be such as to excite”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.