Civil action, to recover the value of a buggy, tried at the Spring Term, 1874, of Lenoib Superior Court, before his Honor, Judge Clarice. The suit was originally commenced in Onslow Superior ■Court and removed to Lenoir upon affidavit. The defendant was an officer, of the rank of Major in the infantry service of the Confederate States, and impressed from the plaintiff in the village of Kinston, in the Spring of 1865, ¡the buggy in controversy.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1941
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
¶1
This case is governed by the decision of this Court in
Bryan v.
Walker, 64 N. C. Rep., 141. In that case the plaintiff recovered because the defendant failed to establish that the impressment was made under an urgent necessity for the public service, such as did not admit of delay, and where the civil authority would be too late in providing the means which the occasion called for. It is not the order of his superior that justifies a military officer in doing an unlawful act; and if the defendant had rested his case upon that proposition, he would have failed. But he went further, and the jury has found that there was a military necessity for the taking; and the facts set forth in the case fully warrant such a finding.
¶2
The impressment of the buggy by order of the defendant, in obedience to the command of Gen. Kirkland, being justified by the emergency, the evidence fails to bring home to the defendant any notice of the order of Gen. Hoke for its restoration to the plaintiff. He is therefore not affected by the disobedience and insubordination of others. The jury has found
*221
that the defendant had no notice of the countermanding order of Gen. Hoke, and that he did not refuse the buggy.
¶3
The charge of his Honor was correct in law ; and this verdict of the jury in favor of the defendant, upon all the issues, conclude the parties.
