Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 N.C. App. 300 - State v. Raines

72 N.C. App. 300 - State v. Raines’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 2017

10 state decisions

601985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Flick v. United States · State v. Overman · State v. Primes · State v. Locklear · State v. Hines

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he essential elements of sexual battery are: (1) sexual contact with another person; (2) by force and against the will of the other person; and (3) for the purpose of sexual arousal, gratification or abuse.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The State obviously realized that fear, fright, or coercion must be reasonably induced before it can replace actual physical force. Indeed, in every constructive force case cited by the district attorney at trial, there was, at least, a threat of physical force, and, in most of the cases, there was actual physical force which preceded or constituted the threat that further force would follow if the victim would not succumb.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a]t common law, fear, fright, or coercion could take the place of actual physical force, or, as stated by our Supreme Court: `A threat of serious bodily harm, which reasonably induces fear thereof, constitutes the requisite force and negates consent.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.