Jacobson v. Brey’s Empirical Analysis
1942
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 1960
4 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The rule supported by the overwhelming weight of authority is that fraud as a ground for vacating a judgment ‘must be what is known as “extrinsic” fraud, that is, fraud in the means whereby the judgment was procured, and not fraud in the cause of action or matter put in issue and presented for adjudication.’ 1 Freeman on Judgments, 5th Ed., pp. 461, 462; 31 Am.Jur., pp. 230, 231.” Jacobson v. Brey, 72 N.D. 269 , 6 N.W.2d 269, 273 ; Schillerstrom v. Schillerstrom, 75 N.D. 667 , 32 N.W.2d 106 , 2 A.L.R.2d 271 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Goetz v. Gunsch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.