Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 NE3D 996 - C.H. v. A.R.

C.H. v. A.R.’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Trinity Homes, LLC v. Fang · Zaring v. Zaring · Michael Day v. State of Indiana · ESPN, Inc. and Paula Lavigne v. University of Notre Dame Police Department · Malachowski v. Bank One, Indianapolis, N.A.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “shall be construed to promote the: (1) protection and safety of all victims of domestic or family violence in a fair, prompt, and effective manner; and (2) prevention of future domestic and family violence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]n the absence of statutory authority or an agreement between the parties to the contrary-or an equitable exception-a prevailing party has no right to recover attorney fees from the opposition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “may petition for an order for protection on behalf of a child. I.C. § 34-26-5-2(b).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.