C.H. v. A.R.’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Trinity Homes, LLC v. Fang · Zaring v. Zaring · Michael Day v. State of Indiana · ESPN, Inc. and Paula Lavigne v. University of Notre Dame Police Department · Malachowski v. Bank One, Indianapolis, N.A.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“shall be construed to promote the: (1) protection and safety of all victims of domestic or family violence in a fair, prompt, and effective manner; and (2) prevention of future domestic and family violence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]n the absence of statutory authority or an agreement between the parties to the contrary-or an equitable exception-a prevailing party has no right to recover attorney fees from the opposition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“may petition for an order for protection on behalf of a child. I.C. § 34-26-5-2(b).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.