Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 N.J. 342 - State v. Abrams

State v. Abrams’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
4
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably State v. Bryant (1987), Laumer v. United States (1979)

30 state decisions

14019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Jamison · Newberry v. Commonwealth · 44 N.J. Super. 507 - Appelget v. Van Hise

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Ibid. Like Justice Clifford, Judge Conford suggested that whether the trustworthiness ascribable to the self-inculpatory portion”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “peculiarly one for the discretionary judgment of the trial judge in the light of all the attendant circumstances.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “on defendant's later exculpatory statement. We are convinced that it did not. In reaching this conclusion, we believe that the criteria we identified for determining testimonial completeness are equally applicable in deciding whether the trustworthiness ascribed to a declaration against penal interest is transferable to subsequent exculpatory accounts. These criteria are useful in determining whether incriminatory and exculpatory statements constitute essentially a single, integral account, such that the trustworthiness of the portion admitting liability”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.